ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the in-hospital and follow-up clinical results of percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)and coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG)in patients of left ventricular dysfunction with coronary artery disease.Methods 147 patients with left ventricular dysfunction were divided into PCI group(n=60)and CABG group(n=87).Clinical,angiographic and revascularization data were collected for analysis.Patients were by SPSS 13.0 software.P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results In-hospital MACCE rates and mortality ofthe two groups were comparable[(6.7%vs 9.2%,P＞0.05)and(1.7%vs 8.0%,P＞0.05)].Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that in-hospital MACCE risk of the two groups were similar(OR≥3.03,95%CI 0.27～34.48,P＞0.05).22-month follow-up showed no signficance in MACCE rates (16.0%vs 13.8%,P＞0.05)and in repeated revaseularization rates(8.O%vs 1.7%,P＞0.05)between the two groups.Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that follow-up MACCE risk of the two groups were comparable (HR≥1.35,95%C/0.44～4.13,P＞0.05).Conclusion In coronary artery disease patients with left ventricular dysfunction,PCI and CABG have similar in-hospital and long-tem MACCE rates.Long-terra effect of PCI would be further increased with the wide use of drug-eluting stents.